↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic profiling of cold adaptation of a deep-sea psychrotolerant Microbacterium sediminis to prolonged low temperature under high hydrostatic pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Metabolic profiling of cold adaptation of a deep-sea psychrotolerant Microbacterium sediminis to prolonged low temperature under high hydrostatic pressure
Published in
Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00253-019-10134-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin-Mei Xia, Xiao-Min Hu, Cai-Hua Huang, Li-Bo Yu, Ru-Fang Xu, Xi-Xiang Tang, Dong-Hai Lin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,215,470
of 14,056,067 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#516
of 5,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,482
of 296,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,056,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,729 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.