↓ Skip to main content

Isolating promoters from Corynebacterium ammoniagenes ATCC 6871 and application in CoA synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Isolating promoters from Corynebacterium ammoniagenes ATCC 6871 and application in CoA synthesis
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12896-019-0568-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hou, Yingshuo, Chen, Siyu, Wang, Jianjun, Liu, Guizhen, Wu, Sheng, Tao, Yong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#11,135,641
of 14,030,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#591
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,941
of 281,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,030,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.