↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation via sexual cognitive/behavioral therapy of pelvic floor muscles versus local injection of botulinum toxin on the sexual functioning of…

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Comparing the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation via sexual cognitive/behavioral therapy of pelvic floor muscles versus local injection of botulinum toxin on the sexual functioning of patients with primary vaginismus: a randomized clinical trial
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00192-018-3836-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mansooreh Yaraghi, Shirin Ghazizadeh, Fariba Mohammadi, Elahe Miri Ashtiani, Mahmood Bakhtiyari, Sayeda Mahjabeen Mareshi, Fatemeh Sadat Sarfjoo, Tahereh Eftekhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 27%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Librarian 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,785,119
of 14,006,078 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#853
of 1,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,303
of 273,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#30
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,006,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,257 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.