↓ Skip to main content

Clinical attachment level gain of lasers in scaling and root planing of chronic periodontitis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Clinical attachment level gain of lasers in scaling and root planing of chronic periodontitis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10103-019-02875-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liying Jia, Jinhai Jia, Meng Xie, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Ting Li, Linan Shi, Hong Shi, Xiaolin Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,509,796
of 13,801,769 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#566
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,653
of 209,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,801,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.