↓ Skip to main content

In memoriam: John Robert Glew (1942–2019)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Paleolimnology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 249)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
Title
In memoriam: John Robert Glew (1942–2019)
Published in
Journal of Paleolimnology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10933-019-00099-9
Authors

John P. Smol

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,064,828
of 13,845,935 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleolimnology
#21
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,007
of 213,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleolimnology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.