↓ Skip to main content

High-stakes assessment in anesthesia via simulation: Are we there yet?

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
Title
High-stakes assessment in anesthesia via simulation: Are we there yet?
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12630-019-01489-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie C. Wright

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,916,694
of 14,021,573 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#644
of 1,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,018
of 285,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
#33
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,021,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.