↓ Skip to main content

Closed-loop neuromuscular electrical stimulation using feedforward-feedback control and textile electrodes to regulate grasp force in quadriplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Bioelectronic Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Closed-loop neuromuscular electrical stimulation using feedforward-feedback control and textile electrodes to regulate grasp force in quadriplegia
Published in
Bioelectronic Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42234-019-0034-y
Authors

John Ciancibello, Kevin King, Milad Alizadeh Meghrazi, Subash Padmanaban, Todd Levy, Richard Ramdeo, Malgorzata Straka, Chad Bouton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#312,005
of 13,877,566 outputs
Outputs from Bioelectronic Medicine
#4
of 26 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,276
of 224,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioelectronic Medicine
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,877,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.7. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.