↓ Skip to main content

Practicing Formative Assessment for Computational Thinking in Making Environments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science Education & Technology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Practicing Formative Assessment for Computational Thinking in Making Environments
Published in
Journal of Science Education & Technology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10956-019-09796-6
Authors

Roxana Hadad, Kate Thomas, Mila Kachovska, Yue Yin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Lecturer 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 43%
Social Sciences 2 29%
Psychology 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,766,952
of 13,982,034 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science Education & Technology
#345
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,723
of 268,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science Education & Technology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,982,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.