↓ Skip to main content

Mutually Unbiased Measurement Based Entanglement Witnesses

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Mutually Unbiased Measurement Based Entanglement Witnesses
Published in
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10773-019-04263-9
Authors

Tao Li, Le-Min Lai, Shao-Ming Fei, Zhi-Xi Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,370,143
of 13,982,034 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#556
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,630
of 268,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Theoretical Physics
#11
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,982,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.