↓ Skip to main content

A novel family VIII carboxylesterase hydrolysing third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
A novel family VIII carboxylesterase hydrolysing third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins
Published in
SpringerPlus, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2172-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeong Ho Jeon, Hyun Sook Lee, Jung Hun Lee, Bon-Sung Koo, Chang-Muk Lee, Sang Hee Lee, Sung Gyun Kang, Jung-Hyun Lee

Abstract

A metagenomic library was constructed from a soil sample of spindle tree-rhizosphere. From this library, one clone with esterase activity was selected. The sequence analysis revealed an open reading frame (EstSTR1) encoded protein of 390 amino acids. EstSTR1 is a family VIII carboxylesterase and retains the S-X-X-K motif conserved in both family VIII carboxylesterases and class C β-lactamases. The estSTR1 gene was overexpressed in E. coli and the recombinant protein was purified by purified by metal chelating affinity chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography. EstSTR1 hydrolysed p-nitrophenyl esters, exhibited the highest activity toward p-nitrophenyl butyrate. Furthermore, EstSTR1 could hydrolyse third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime and cefepime) as well as first-generation cephalosporin (cephalothin). Site-directed mutagenesis studies revealed that a catalytic residue, Ser71, of EstSTR1 plays an essential role in hydrolysing both antibiotics and p-nitrophenyl esters. We demonstrate that a metagenome-derived carboxylesterase displays β-lactam-hydrolysing activities toward third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,809,195
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#387
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,167
of 304,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#33
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.