↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Fundamental Combustion Phenomena in Wire Fires

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Technology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 512)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
A Review of Fundamental Combustion Phenomena in Wire Fires
Published in
Fire Technology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10694-019-00918-5
Authors

Xinyan Huang, Yuji Nakamura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Energy 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,288,489
of 14,023,433 outputs
Outputs from Fire Technology
#26
of 512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,907
of 287,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Technology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,023,433 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.