↓ Skip to main content

Making way for a clinical feedback system in the narrow space between sessions: navigating competing demands in complex healthcare settings

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Making way for a clinical feedback system in the narrow space between sessions: navigating competing demands in complex healthcare settings
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13033-019-0324-5
Authors

Hovland, Runar Tengel, Moltu, Christian

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,175,720
of 13,982,034 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#280
of 488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,363
of 270,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#39
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,982,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.