↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic single-slice CT estimates whole-lung dual-energy CT variables in pigs with and without experimental lung injury

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic single-slice CT estimates whole-lung dual-energy CT variables in pigs with and without experimental lung injury
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40635-019-0273-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John N. Cronin, João Batista Borges, Douglas C. Crockett, Andrew D. Farmery, Göran Hedenstierna, Anders Larsson, Minh C. Tran, Luigi Camporota, Federico Formenti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,911,497
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#156
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,608
of 362,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.