↓ Skip to main content

Book Review: Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks: Potential and pitfalls. Allen Leung and Anna Baccaglini-Frank (Eds.): (2017)

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Book Review: Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks: Potential and pitfalls. Allen Leung and Anna Baccaglini-Frank (Eds.): (2017)
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10649-019-09918-2
Authors

Kathryn M. Rich

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,321,880
of 14,202,103 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#110
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,871
of 316,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,202,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.