↓ Skip to main content

Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 105)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Dental implants in patients with epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review
Published in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10006-019-00802-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic, Ricardo Santiago Gomez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 33%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,639,899
of 13,989,129 outputs
Outputs from Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#34
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,424
of 280,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,989,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them