↓ Skip to main content

Effects of starvation and Vegetation Distribution on Locust Collective Motion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Behavior, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Effects of starvation and Vegetation Distribution on Locust Collective Motion
Published in
Journal of Insect Behavior, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10905-019-09727-8
Authors

Jamila Dkhili, Koutaro Ould Maeno, Lalla Mina Idrissi Hassani, Said Ghaout, Cyril Piou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 47%
Energy 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,950,527
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Behavior
#470
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,670
of 373,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Behavior
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.