↓ Skip to main content

Effects of starvation and Vegetation Distribution on Locust Collective Motion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Behavior, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Effects of starvation and Vegetation Distribution on Locust Collective Motion
Published in
Journal of Insect Behavior, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10905-019-09727-8
Authors

Jamila Dkhili, Koutaro Ould Maeno, Lalla Mina Idrissi Hassani, Said Ghaout, Cyril Piou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#11,029,681
of 13,897,020 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Behavior
#288
of 437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,490
of 248,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Behavior
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,897,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 437 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them