↓ Skip to main content

Mining reading patterns from eye-tracking data: method and demonstration

Overview of attention for article published in Software & Systems Modeling, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 419)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
Title
Mining reading patterns from eye-tracking data: method and demonstration
Published in
Software & Systems Modeling, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10270-019-00759-4
Authors

Constantina Ioannou, Indira Nurdiani, Andrea Burattin, Barbara Weber

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,602,179
of 13,763,705 outputs
Outputs from Software & Systems Modeling
#39
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,721
of 218,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Software & Systems Modeling
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,763,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.