↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic impact of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with septic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic impact of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with septic shock
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-016-0136-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Céline Gonzalez, Emmanuelle Begot, François Dalmay, Nicolas Pichon, Bruno François, Anne-Laure Fedou, Catherine Chapellas, Antoine Galy, Claire Mancia, Thomas Daix, Philippe Vignon

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent in the general population and associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. Its prognostic role in patients sustaining septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains controversial. Accordingly, we investigated whether LV diastolic function was independently associated with ICU mortality in a cohort of septic shock patients assessed using critical care echocardiography. Over a 5-year period, patients hospitalized in a Medical-Surgical ICU who underwent an echocardiographic assessment with digitally stored images during the initial management of a septic shock were included in this retrospective single-center study. Off-line echocardiographic measurements were independently performed by an expert in critical care echocardiography who was unaware of patients' outcome. LV diastolic dysfunction was defined by the presence of a lateral E' maximal velocity <10 cm/s. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors associated with ICU mortality. Among the 540 patients hospitalized in the ICU with septic shock during the study period, 223 were studied (140 men [63 %]; age 64 ± 13 years; SAPS II 55 ± 18; SOFA 10 ± 3; Charlson 3.5 ± 2.5) and 204 of them (91 %) were mechanically ventilated. ICU mortality was 35 %. LV diastolic dysfunction was observed in 31 % of patients. The proportion of LV diastolic dysfunction tended to be higher in non-survivors than in their counterparts (28/78 [36 %] vs. 41/145 [28 %]: p = 0.15). Inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy (OR 4.17 [CI 95 % 1.33-12.5]: p = 0.03), maximal dose of vasopressors (OR 1.38 [CI 95 % 1.16-1.63]: p = 0.01), SOFA score (OR 1.16 [CI 95 % 1.02-1.32]: p = 0.02) and lateral E' maximal velocity (OR 1.12 [CI 95 % 1.01-1.24]: p = 0.02) were independently associated with ICU mortality. After adjusting for the SAPS II score, inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy and maximal dose of vasopressors remained independent factors for ICU mortality, whereas a trend was only observed for lateral E' maximal velocity (OR 1.11 [CI 95 % 0.99-1.23]: p = 0.07). The present study suggests that LV diastolic function might be associated with ICU mortality in patients with septic shock. A multicenter prospective study assessing a large cohort of patients using serial echocardiographic examinations remains required to confirm the prognostic value of LV diastolic dysfunction in septic shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,357,612
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#820
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,516
of 300,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.