↓ Skip to main content

The rate of myocardial perfusion recovery after steroid therapy and its implication for cardiac events in cardiac sarcoidosis and primarily preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
The rate of myocardial perfusion recovery after steroid therapy and its implication for cardiac events in cardiac sarcoidosis and primarily preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12350-019-01916-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuhiro Koyanagawa, Masanao Naya, Tadao Aikawa, Osamu Manabe, Sho Furuya, Masato Kuzume, Noriko Oyama-Manabe, Hiroshi Ohira, Ichizo Tsujino, Toshihisa Anzai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,748,185
of 13,770,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#531
of 1,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,181
of 223,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,770,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,300 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.