↓ Skip to main content

It’s not what you expect: feedback negativity is independent of reward expectation and affective responsivity in a non-probabilistic task

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Informatics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
It’s not what you expect: feedback negativity is independent of reward expectation and affective responsivity in a non-probabilistic task
Published in
Brain Informatics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40708-016-0050-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan M. Highsmith, Karl L. Wuensch, Tuan Tran, Alexandra J. Stephenson, D. Erik Everhart

Abstract

ERP studies commonly utilize gambling-based reinforcement tasks to elicit feedback negativity (FN) responses. This study used a pattern learning task in order to limit gambling-related fallacious reasoning and possible affective responses to gambling, while investigating relationships between the FN components between high and low reward expectation conditions. Eighteen undergraduates completed measures of reinforcement sensitivity, trait and state affect, and psychophysiological recording. The pattern learning task elicited a FN component for both high and low win expectancy conditions, which was found to be independent of reward expectation and showed little relationship with task and personality variables. We also observed a P3 component, which showed sensitivity to outcome expectancy variation and relationships to measures of anxiety, appetitive motivation, and cortical asymmetry, although these varied by electrode location and expectancy condition. Findings suggest that the FN reflected a binary reward-related signal, with little relationship to reward expectation found in previous studies, in the absence of positive affective responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 37%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Engineering 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,453,763
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Brain Informatics
#83
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,031
of 299,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Informatics
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.