↓ Skip to main content

Impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia on mortality and epidemiological features of patients with secondary peritonitis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia on mortality and epidemiological features of patients with secondary peritonitis
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-016-0137-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Heredia-Rodríguez, María Teresa Peláez, Inmaculada Fierro, Esther Gómez-Sánchez, Estefanía Gómez-Pesquera, Mario Lorenzo, F. Javier Álvarez-González, Juan Bustamante-Munguira, José María Eiros, Jesús F. Bermejo-Martin, José I. Gómez-Herreras, Eduardo Tamayo

Abstract

Despite the significant impact of nosocomial infections on the morbidity and mortality of patients staying in the intensive care unit (ICU), no study over the past 20 years has focused specifically on VAP following secondary peritonitis. The objective of the present study was to determine in-hospital mortality and epidemiological features attributed to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) following secondary peritonitis. Prospective observational study involved 418 consecutive patients admitted in the ICU. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with mortality and development of VAP. The incidence of VAP following secondary peritonitis was 9.6 %. Risk factors associated with the development of VAP were hospital-acquired peritonitis, requiring >48 h of mechanical ventilation, and SOFA score. The onset of VAP was late in majority of patients. VAP was developed about 16.8 days after the initiation of the peritonitis. Etiological microorganisms responsible for the peritonitis were different than for VAP. The 90-day in-hospital mortality rate was 47.5 % of VAP patients. Independent factors associated with 30- to 90-day in-hospital mortality were VAP and SOFA. In light of the impact on morbidity and mortality in the ICU, more attention should be given to the concurrent features among VAP and secondary peritonitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 26%
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,379,687
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#909
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,402
of 300,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#24
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.