↓ Skip to main content

ESICM LIVES 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
Title
ESICM LIVES 2019
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40635-019-0265-y
Pubmed ID
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 439 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Student > Master 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Researcher 21 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 4%
Other 67 15%
Unknown 221 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 13%
Computer Science 15 3%
Unspecified 12 3%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 225 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,583,130
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#272
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,061
of 346,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.