↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors in Krukenberg tumor

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Prognostic factors in Krukenberg tumor
Published in
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00404-019-05301-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruggero Lionetti, Marcello De Luca, Antonio Travaglino, Antonio Raffone, Gabriele Saccone, Antonietta Di Cicco, Luigi Insabato, Massimo Mascolo, Maria D’Armiento, Fulvio Zullo, Francesco Corcione

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#12,126,010
of 13,663,325 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#899
of 1,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,181
of 195,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,663,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.