↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation by a mycoremediation fungus, Dentipellis sp. KUC8613

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation by a mycoremediation fungus, Dentipellis sp. KUC8613
Published in
Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00253-019-10089-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongjae Park, Byoungnam Min, Yeongseon Jang, Jungyeon Kim, Anna Lipzen, Aditi Sharma, Bill Andreopoulos, Jenifer Johnson, Robert Riley, Joseph W. Spatafora, Bernard Henrissat, Kyoung Heon Kim, Igor V. Grigoriev, Jae-Jin Kim, In-Geol Choi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,574,079
of 13,644,932 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#3,901
of 5,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,099
of 190,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,932 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,557 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.