| Title |
Patient reported outcomes – experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-018-0059-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Biber, Dominik Ose, Jenny Reese, Anna Gardiner, Julio Facelli, Joshua Spuhl, Darrel Brodke, Vivian S. Lee, Rachel Hess, Howard Weeks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Denmark | 1 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,225,638
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#68
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,930
of 333,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.