| Title |
Recent progress of seismic observation networks in Japan —Hi-net, F-net, K-NET and KiK-net—
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bf03353076 |
| Authors |
Yoshimitsu Okada, Keiji Kasahara, Sadaki Hori, Kazushige Obara, Shoji Sekiguchi, Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Akira Yamamoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 71 | 57% |
| Engineering | 13 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,261,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#173
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,818
of 243,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#4
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.