↓ Skip to main content

Neuromuscular blocking agents for acute respiratory distress syndrome: how did we get conflicting results?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Neuromuscular blocking agents for acute respiratory distress syndrome: how did we get conflicting results?
Published in
Critical Care, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2586-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather Torbic, Sudhir Krishnan, Abhijit Duggal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,846,253
of 13,612,446 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,845
of 4,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,208
of 211,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,446 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them