↓ Skip to main content

Plant functional group effects on peat carbon cycling in a boreal rich fen

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
Title
Plant functional group effects on peat carbon cycling in a boreal rich fen
Published in
Biogeochemistry, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10533-019-00590-5
Authors

Danielle Rupp, Evan S. Kane, Catherine Dieleman, Jason K. Keller, Merritt Turetsky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,432,026
of 13,601,191 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#129
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,904
of 205,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,601,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.