Title |
Effects of different stocking densities on performance and activity of cattle × yak hybrids along a transhumance route in the Eastern Himalaya
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40064-015-1175-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shanker R Barsila, Naba R Devkota, Michael Kreuzer, Svenja Marquardt |
Abstract |
Twelve lactating cattle × yak hybrids (B. taurus × B. grunniens) were investigated on five experimental pastures (Sites 1-5), following an up- and downward transhumance route (3,200, 4,000, 4,500, 4,000 and 2,600 m a.s.l.). Hybrids were kept in replicated groups of two (low SD) and four animals per paddock (high SD). As a control, yaks (with calves) were included at low SD at Sites 2-4. Performance was described by body weight, milk yield and composition. Herbage samples as selected by the animals were analyzed. Activity patterns of the hybrids were assessed at Sites 2-4. At similar body weight change and milk composition, the individual hybrids on average produced 26% less milk at high than at low SD. However, at high SD on average still 49% more milk/m(2) of pasture area was produced. Milk fat increased with time from 5.4 to 7.1%, milk protein decreased from 4.2 to 3.3%. At high SD, the hybrids spent less time standing and more time lying. The yaks gained weight at 4,500 m a.s.l. while the hybrids lost weight (+836 and -653 g/animal/day, respectively). In conclusion, high SD reduced individual milk yield and forced hybrids to spend more time for feeding. The yaks apparently had an advantage over the hybrids at very high altitude. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 4% |
Czechia | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 35% |
Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 17% |
Engineering | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |