| Title |
Interval-cohort designs and bias in the estimation of per-protocol effects: a simulation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-019-3577-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica G. Young, Rajet Vatsa, Eleanor J. Murray, Miguel A. Hernán |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 14% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 57% |
| Scientists | 21 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 29% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |