↓ Skip to main content

Wachstumsbeschwerden zur Zeit der knöchernen Entwicklung der Tuberositas metatarsi quinti

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, July 1912
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Wachstumsbeschwerden zur Zeit der knöchernen Entwicklung der Tuberositas metatarsi quinti
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, July 1912
DOI 10.1007/bf02794784
Authors

Hans Iselin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,597,135
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#192
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them