| Title |
Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [18F]FDG evaluation of dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Research, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13550-019-0553-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silje Kjærnes Øen, Thomas Morten Keil, Erik Magnus Berntsen, Joel Fredrik Aanerud, Thomas Schwarzlmüller, Claes Nøhr Ladefoged, Anna Maria Karlberg, Live Eikenes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,255,873
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#56
of 566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,628
of 340,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.