↓ Skip to main content

Economic and Psychosocial Impact of Problem Gambling in South Korea

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Economic and Psychosocial Impact of Problem Gambling in South Korea
Published in
Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/bf03342123
Authors

JongSerl Chun, Sangmi Cho, Ick-Joong Chung, Seiwan Kim

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,910,302
of 15,621,958 outputs
Outputs from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#13
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,828
of 262,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,621,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them