Title |
Acute toxicity of essential oils to the pest slug Deroceras reticulatum in laboratory and greenhouse bioassays
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pest Science, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10340-019-01154-0 |
Authors |
Matthew L. Klein, Thomas G. Chastain, Carol J. Garbacik, Yan Ping L. Qian, Rory J. Mc Donnell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 17% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Nigeria | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 30% |
Chemistry | 3 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,619,303
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#103
of 642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,186
of 352,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.