| Title |
Animal ICU… Why not also use the existing veterinary ICUs?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0568-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florent Baudin, Céline Pouzot-Nevoret, Vanessa Louzier, Isabelle Goy-Thollot, Anthony Barthélemy, Stéphane Junot, Jeanne-Marie Bonnet-Garin, Bernard Allaouchiche |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Denmark | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 75% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,709,902
of 24,172,513 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#680
of 1,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,315
of 316,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#20
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,172,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.