↓ Skip to main content

Endogenous attention to costs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 218)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
Title
Endogenous attention to costs
Published in
Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11166-019-09308-2
Authors

Linda Thunström, Chian Jones Ritten

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,370,312
of 13,521,168 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk & Uncertainty
#35
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,483
of 177,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk & Uncertainty
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,521,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them