↓ Skip to main content

Improving Network Science in Health Services Research

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Improving Network Science in Health Services Research
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05264-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael L. Barnett

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,674,080
of 13,420,122 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,000
of 4,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,847
of 129,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#52
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,420,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.