↓ Skip to main content

Does water-saving irrigation improve the quality of fruits and vegetables? Evidence from meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Irrigation Science, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Does water-saving irrigation improve the quality of fruits and vegetables? Evidence from meta-analysis
Published in
Irrigation Science, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00271-019-00646-2
Authors

Michael O. Adu, David O. Yawson, Ernest E. Abano, Paul A. Asare, Frederick A. Armah, Eugene K. Opoku

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,474,285
of 13,514,491 outputs
Outputs from Irrigation Science
#73
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,280
of 212,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irrigation Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them