↓ Skip to main content

VEGF-A and blood vessels: a beta cell perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
Title
VEGF-A and blood vessels: a beta cell perspective
Published in
Diabetologia, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00125-019-4969-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Willem Staels, Yves Heremans, Harry Heimberg, Nico De Leu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,315,215
of 13,441,497 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,542
of 3,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,897
of 174,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#52
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,441,497 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.