| Title |
Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05713-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan A. Silversides, Anders Perner, Manu L. N. G. Malbrain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 499 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 8% |
| Mexico | 39 | 8% |
| Spain | 34 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 6% |
| Colombia | 23 | 5% |
| Brazil | 14 | 3% |
| Italy | 11 | 2% |
| Argentina | 9 | 2% |
| France | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 112 | 22% |
| Unknown | 177 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 377 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 79 | 16% |
| Scientists | 35 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 157 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 27% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 62% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 307. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#114,554
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#71
of 5,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,056
of 357,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.