↓ Skip to main content

Performance of axillary and rectal temperature measurement in private pediatric practice

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Performance of axillary and rectal temperature measurement in private pediatric practice
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00431-019-03438-0
Authors

Jan Teller, Reto Bernasconi, Giacomo D. Simonetti, Sebastiano A. G. Lava

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 67%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,741,589
of 13,756,564 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,455
of 2,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,389
of 249,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#44
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,756,564 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.