↓ Skip to main content

Important differences and meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Important differences and meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41687-018-0071-4
Authors

M L Bell, H M Dhillon, V J Bray, J L Vardy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Psychology 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,578,089
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#309
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,554
of 346,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.