The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Cross-sectional association between non-soy legume consumption, serum uric acid and hyperuricemia: the PREDIMED-Plus study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-019-02070-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Guillermo Mena-Sánchez, Andrés Díaz-López, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, Nancy Babio, Dolores Corella, Gala Freixer, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J. Alfredo Martínez, Lluís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, José Carlos Fernández-García, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A. Tur, José López-Miranda, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, José Juan Gaforio, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emili Ros, Cristina Razquin, Iván Abellán Cano, Jose V. Sorli, Laura Torres, Marga Morey, Eva Mª Navarrete-Muñoz, Lucas Tojal Sierra, Edelys Crespo-Oliva, M. Ángeles Zulet, Almudena Sanchez-Villegas, Rosa Casas, M. Rosa Bernal-Lopez, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Rebeca Fernández-Carrión, Mireia Quifer, Rafel M. Prieto, Noelia Fernandez-Brufal, Itziar Salaverria Lete, Juan Carlos Cenoz, Regina Llimona, Jordi Salas-Salvadó |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 42% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,086,912
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#553
of 2,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,594
of 358,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.