↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Cross-sectional association between non-soy legume consumption, serum uric acid and hyperuricemia: the PREDIMED-Plus study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
Cross-sectional association between non-soy legume consumption, serum uric acid and hyperuricemia: the PREDIMED-Plus study
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00394-019-02070-w
Pubmed ID
31385063
Authors

Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Guillermo Mena-Sánchez, Andrés Díaz-López, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, Nancy Babio, Dolores Corella, Gala Freixer, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J. Alfredo Martínez, Lluís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, José Carlos Fernández-García, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A. Tur, José López-Miranda, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, José Juan Gaforio, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emili Ros, Cristina Razquin, Iván Abellán Cano, Jose V. Sorli, Laura Torres, Marga Morey, Eva Mª Navarrete-Muñoz, Lucas Tojal Sierra, Edelys Crespo-Oliva, M. Ángeles Zulet, Almudena Sanchez-Villegas, Rosa Casas, M. Rosa Bernal-Lopez, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Rebeca Fernández-Carrión, Mireia Quifer, Rafel M. Prieto, Noelia Fernandez-Brufal, Itziar Salaverria Lete, Juan Carlos Cenoz, Regina Llimona, Jordi Salas-Salvadó

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 6 8%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Psychology 5 7%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 26 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,259,562
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#877
of 2,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,599
of 345,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.