↓ Skip to main content

Cross-sectional association between non-soy legume consumption, serum uric acid and hyperuricemia: the PREDIMED-Plus study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Cross-sectional association between non-soy legume consumption, serum uric acid and hyperuricemia: the PREDIMED-Plus study
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00394-019-02070-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Guillermo Mena-Sánchez, Andrés Díaz-López, Miguel Ángel Martínez-González, Nancy Babio, Dolores Corella, Gala Freixer, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, J. Alfredo Martínez, Lluís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, José Carlos Fernández-García, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A. Tur, José López-Miranda, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, José Juan Gaforio, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emili Ros, Cristina Razquin, Iván Abellán Cano, Jose V. Sorli, Laura Torres, Marga Morey, Eva Mª Navarrete-Muñoz, Lucas Tojal Sierra, Edelys Crespo-Oliva, M. Ángeles Zulet, Almudena Sanchez-Villegas, Rosa Casas, M. Rosa Bernal-Lopez, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, Emili Corbella, Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Miguel Ruiz-Canela, Rebeca Fernández-Carrión, Mireia Quifer, Rafel M. Prieto, Noelia Fernandez-Brufal, Itziar Salaverria Lete, Juan Carlos Cenoz, Regina Llimona, Jordi Salas-Salvadó

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Psychology 4 9%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,770,852
of 16,248,698 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#569
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,615
of 264,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#21
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,248,698 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.