↓ Skip to main content

Field models and numerical dosimetry inside an extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic bioreactor: the theoretical link between the electromagnetically induced mechanical forces and the biological…

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Field models and numerical dosimetry inside an extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic bioreactor: the theoretical link between the electromagnetically induced mechanical forces and the biological mechanisms of the cell tensegrity
Published in
SpringerPlus, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-473
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Evelina Mognaschi, Paolo Di Barba, Giovanni Magenes, Andrea Lenzi, Fabio Naro, Lorenzo Fassina

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#18,025,888
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,209
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,075
of 237,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#74
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.