↓ Skip to main content

Variable retention forestry in European boreal forests in Russia

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Variable retention forestry in European boreal forests in Russia
Published in
Ecological Processes, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13717-019-0183-7
Authors

Ekaterina Shorohova, Sergey Sinkevich, Aleksandr Kryshen, Ilkka Vanha-Majamaa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,466,015
of 13,500,585 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#52
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,578
of 222,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,500,585 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them