↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive assessment of airflows by electrical impedance tomography in intubated hypoxemic patients: an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive assessment of airflows by electrical impedance tomography in intubated hypoxemic patients: an exploratory study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0560-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommaso Mauri, Elena Spinelli, Francesca Dalla Corte, Eleonora Scotti, Cecilia Turrini, Marta Lazzeri, Laura Alban, Marco Albanese, Donatella Tortolani, Yu-Mei Wang, Savino Spadaro, Jian-Xin Zhou, Antonio Pesenti, Giacomo Grasselli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Engineering 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 20 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,587,622
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#611
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,965
of 347,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.