| Title |
NICE and Fair? Health Technology Assessment Policy Under the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 1999–2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Care Analysis, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10728-019-00381-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Charlton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 32% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 63% |
| Scientists | 12 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 46 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 51 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#856,597
of 25,349,102 outputs
Outputs from Health Care Analysis
#3
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,168
of 351,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Care Analysis
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them