↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10067-019-04678-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Khoo, Michael B. Stokes, Karen Teo, Susanna Proudman, Sajini Basnayake, Prashanthan Sanders, Vidya Limaye

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Engineering 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,515,654
of 14,156,319 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,600
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,616
of 252,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#46
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,156,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.