| Title |
Long-term neurocognitive outcome is not worsened by of the use of venovenous ECMO in severe ARDS patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0556-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aude Sylvestre, Mélanie Adda, François Maltese, Ariane Lannelongue, Florence Daviet, Gabriel Parzy, Benjamin Coiffard, Antoine Roch, Anderson Loundou, Karine Baumstarck, Laurent Papazian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 27% |
| Psychology | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,025,055
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#894
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,371
of 346,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.